Why can’t Republicans just stay out of women’s privates? I don’t get why they are so into this. The conversation needs to be reframed: Even though we agree life begins at conception, THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER, the carrier of said-seed, supersedes the unknown-unborn. The mother’s life is already there and struggling; she needs hope and re-birth for herself. Republicans just throw the mama out. The second she gets pregnant, move aside mama. As if abortions are a laugh a minute and everyone’s rushing to get one. When a woman can raise a child in spite of odds, she can. But when she really can’t, trust, she can’t.

Read “Freakonomics”!!! Data shows that violent crime went down the generation after Roe vs. Wade. Reason? No, not just adding more police — there are not as many unwanted children taking their rage out on the world. Life of mother and WANTED children! Otherwise, if you want to strip women of their rights and bodies, Republicans better be willing to take in all those babies and raise them themselves. How about Accidental Baby Vouchers to be given out when child support is nowhere to be seen? Straight from the private sector of Romney’s bank account! Yes! Open up Bush’s Crawford Ranch as an orphanage! After ruining our country, what else does he have to do?
Republicans Struggle to Contain Mourdock Comments
thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com
Advertisements